http://www.wpwp.org/forums/tags/statistics WassUp Forums » Tag: statistics - Recent Posts en-US Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:39:30 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.3 q http://www.wpwp.org/forums/search.php http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/how-accurate-is-wassup#post-423 Fri, 13 Jun 2008 02:41:50 +0000 rtiger 423@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>Thanks, that confirmation helps. </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/how-accurate-is-wassup#post-420 Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:37:21 +0000 Michele 420@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>rtiger pages are avery single post or page loaded. It doens't count hits to images, scripts and so on. </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/how-accurate-is-wassup#post-417 Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:31:40 +0000 rtiger 417@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>I was wondering what Wassup counts as a "Page View". Are these individual page loads (including refreshes etc.) or hits on a page? Sometimes the difference between what Wassup says and another plugin like Slim-Stat says is significant. Wassup could be 3-8 times what the other traffic plugins report. Which one is correct. It would help if I understood how Wassup tracks visitors and page views and how it defines each.</p> <p>Thanks. </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/how-accurate-is-wassup#post-345 Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:33:08 +0000 helene 345@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>Squirrel,<br /> Wassup may not be recording your visitors. Go to the Wassup menu ==&gt; Options and click on the [Statistics Recording] Tab. The 1st item is "Enable/Disable recording". This must be selected. </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/how-accurate-is-wassup#post-338 Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:23:56 +0000 squirrel 338@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>i think i must have done something wrong, because my wassup isn't showing any visitors but my wp-stats says otherwise. </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/how-accurate-is-wassup#post-337 Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:17:42 +0000 Babarum 337@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>I tried before, and use actually many statistic tools (some WP plugins too), and I realized, that WassUp is the most accurate tool I ever seen.<br /> If feed stats would be separated, it would be perfect.<br /> I saw the ticket for it, so we are not far! :)</p> <p>Thank you for this great tool! </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/top-stats-for-feed#post-239 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 05:51:37 +0000 helene 239@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>I wanted to include atom feeds in this stats change request as well. On my site, the URL is "/feed/atom".</p> <p>Thanks again. </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/top-stats-for-feed#post-238 Tue, 04 Mar 2008 01:27:13 +0000 Michele 238@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>Hi Helene,<br /> good idea, I opened a ticket in the trac: <a href="http://trac.wpwp.org/ticket/42">Separate statistics for feeds requests</a>.<br /> Thank you </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/top-stats-for-feed#post-237 Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:36:20 +0000 helene 237@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>Hi Michele,<br /> I have a suggestion for a stats addon/change:<br /> -Create separate "Feed Reader" Top stats and remove "feeds" from "Top OS"/"Top Browser" stats and possibly even from "Top URL request".<br /> -Add exclusion for "feeds" in Wassup recording options (for the URL request, not the user-agent).</p> <p>"feed" is the #1 page request on my site. Not by bots, but by browsers (FF,Safari) and desktop applications launched by individuals. Eg. I have a subscriber via "Google Desktop" gadget that automatically queries my feed at least 4 times an hour, nonstop, 24x7. Firefox built-in feed reader is another app that does frequent automatic feed queries. I prefer that feed be separate so that it does not skew the other stats.</p> <p>Thanks. </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/how-accurate-is-wassup#post-157 Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:31:32 +0000 bootsmaat 157@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>Ok, thank you Michele. </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/how-accurate-is-wassup#post-155 Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:41:51 +0000 Michele 155@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>Every statistics tools have their own method to record items, WassUp gathers a lot of information including (if it's set) attack attempt, spam, spiders, etc... so this could be little more then other tools. If someone could report his own experience with other tools, we will appreciate it.</p> <p>With version 1.4.5 WassUp gathers every hits in our blogs, with or without cookies enabled (javascript is not important to get items). </p> http://www.wpwp.org/forums/topic/how-accurate-is-wassup#post-151 Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:42:07 +0000 bootsmaat 151@http://www.wpwp.org/forums/ <p>Hey there,</p> <p>Has anyone compared the WassUp stats with the numbers of other stat tools? I'd be interested in how big the differences are.</p> <p>Oh, and does WassUp tracking rely on Java Script or will it also track people who have it disabled?</p> <p>Thanks.</p> <p>(Not sure whether this is the right forum - just move the topic if not. Thanks.) </p>